Thursday, 19 December 2019

Film Review - Black Christmas

This remake of a remake of a 1974 horror movie in which a group of young women are stalked by a mysterious figure has generated a lot of negative attention since its release on Thursday. Its IMDb page is a treat, I’ll tell you that. However, I do have a glimmer of hope. It’s not like I have high standards or anything...and then I read about director Sophia Takal say this was a ‘fiercely feminist film’, and I can’t help but hold my head in my hands. If you’re going to say something like that to the press as declaratively as you have, you better be sure the movie is at least passable, because if it’s not you’re not just going to have people, both critics and audiences, jumping down your throat because the movie is bad, you’re also going to have people who shove what you say right back in your face and declare that the film is some kind of misguided political statement as well as a bad film. And thus, in a flash of clarity, the overwhelmingly negative response from audiences and mostly negative response from critics made all the sense in the world. 

But, at the same time, Blumhouse did bring us Get Out in 2017 with Jordan Peele at the helm, and that film nails its political points and received acclaim because of it, and that was a full-length directorial debut. There are ways to get this right that this film has apparently nailed so catastrophically that people are not only highlighting how it stumbles from a feminist perspective, but also how it apparently does a disservice to the #MeToo movement as well. What went wrong? How could this all have gone so badly? 

Then I looked up the critical response to the initial 2006 remake, and everything just seemed to make even more sense. It raises the question of who thought this was a good idea in the first place, especially if you were going to be experimenting with a feminist narrative that needed to work to come close to pleasing audiences. This just seemed like a bad idea from the start, but nobody told whoever originally conceived of it to stop and reconsider. As such, Sophia Takal was tasked with something that seems impossible from the outside looking in. But I don’t entirely sympathise with her entirely. After all, she did write the film too, and thus had some control over the integration of the feminist elements of the narrative. Also, can you tell I’m stalling and have been for the past three paragraphs? Okay fine. Let’s get on with it. How’s the film? 

Whoa. I’m honestly not sure what to make of this. And this is not a Midsommar case where the film is just so fucked up that it demands attention regardless. This is a rare one. A film crippled by one key flaw that sees the whole thing hilariously unravel. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a well-intentioned film like this as fundamentally misguided as this one. 

And that aforementioned problem is subtlety. I don’t know who, but someone left it out. There is no subtlety in Black Christmas. And while that might not be a problem in some cases, when a film is trying to act as a feminist political commentary about sexual abuse, a blunter script just makes the film feel horrendously one dimensional, even more so than Last Christmas, a film I already didn’t like for its thin political stance. 

But at least that film’s one dimensionality lead to some charming moments. Because, let’s not forget, Black Christmas is a horror movie. And on that note, let me give the film the slightest hint of credit: the horror sections are not terrible, with the first death being easily the best moment of the film. It’s intense as the character runs from door to door through thick snow, trying desperately to find anyone who will help her, before being stabbed to death with an icicle. Of course, while the drama might be all well and good, it’s all undercut in the end anyway, in one of the most self-satisfied, ungratifying and downright lazy ending to a film that I’ve ever had he misfortune of exposing myself to. 

But while that opening moment of horror might work in that moment. The rest of the film is mostly set in dark halls. Fine, I can roll with that. That is, if the horror wasn’t so slow. Yes, the acting might not be consistent, but it’s not like the direction Sophia Takal is giving them to work with is allowing them to properly emotive. I’m sorry, but young women slowly plodding down a corridor as the editing cuts between close ups and hazy wide shots is not intense in the slightest. 

Although, I do kind of feel sorry for the actors for the script they were given. Not only do a lot of the girls play to broad stereotypes, it doesn't feel like there’s anything to the characters beyond just being toys for the main antagonist, the protagonists sexually abusive ex (or they might not have even been in a relationship at all I don’t know or care). 

And I suppose that takes us to our main theme: women and sexual abuse. And to be brutally honest, I’m not sure anyone associated with this film knows what either of those things are. Seriously. The first scene that tackles the theme, four of the girls are scantily clad, dressed in Santa costumes, and performing a cutesy dance on stage to an audience that our antagonist is among. This just reads as a cutesy kiss-off rather than anything of substance, a considerable problem when you consider the theme in question is sexual assault. You really don’t want to be accosting sexual abuse with the cutesiness of a scene like this. 

Of course, I’m not trying to suggest that it gets any better, or even explores the theme any more than that. Sure, the current boyfriend of one of the girls (I can’t remember names and can’t be bothered to look them up) does get into an argument, suggesting that the main girl is antagonising all men (something the film does more than the characters), and there is that idea of the police not believing the girl who claimed she had been sexually abused that is mentioned in one scene, but that’s it. The film’s climax is more centred around the broader theme of patriarchy rather than anything close to specific, and how some people have fallen victim to the system, thinking that’s it’s just normal. And this is where the fact that the film is devoid of all subtlety in the writing comes through the most and hurts this film hard. The writing is so declarative and devoid of metaphor that the antagonist comes across as woefully pathetic in the film’s closing moments. Not helped by the fact that all the girls magically come back to life anyway, and if no one associated with this film cares about dramatic stakes, why should I care about this film. The answer is I shouldn’t. 

And speaking of those closing moments, our main character is staring at a burning building of their own doing. But in Midsommar, that shot was haunting, highlighting the new beginning that lies ahead for our protagonist; a literal burning away of what came before as she finally finds her peace in the most unlikely of places. Black Christmas meanwhile is not only the shallowest and most basic attempt at a political commentary, it’s also the shallowest and basic attempt at a horror movie I’ve ever seen. And in a year where I’ve learned to appreciate the art of horror more than ever before, I can only hope and pray that it gets forgotten. I thought Wild Rose had a lock on the worst film of the year title as the year neared its end. I might have been wrong after all.

3 / 10

No comments:

Post a Comment